ManusJustus said:
You need governent funding for advanced technology. The free market cannot realize that satellites would be a good investment, so they would never be the first to develop satellites by themselves without government assistance. NASA may hire the private sector to build or do research through public funding, but this is still government involvement in the economy because the free market can not provide such technology or goods by itself. Healthcare is done more efficiently in a public system. This is do to healthcare's nature as a public good and a regional monopoly, resulting in market failure. America pays three times more for healthcare than Great Britain, do you think America's healthcare system is three times greater? It cant be, if Britain paid as much as we do they would have three times as many hospitals, three times as many doctors, and so forth. Below links are figures on healthcare funding (private and public). http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/hea_hea_car_fun_tot_per_cap-care-funding-total-per-capita Your opinions are incompatiable with economics. I'll introduce you to market failure: http://www.economist.com/research/economics/alphabetic.cfm?letter=M#marketfailure Thats right, a very rightwing site suggests taxes and subsidies to provide things that the market is unable to provide efficiently. That is why you should be thankful that the government put a computer in your room, gave you the internet, and gave you satellites to communicate with. If the government did not research and develop these areas, you'd probably be reading a book right now. |
I just want to add.
http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=40506&start=0
Here you can see how well the "private sector" has done.
I agree, a free market Health Care system would be best for the U.S. But politicians won't allow it.
Democrats want to socialize it, which I don't like.
Republicans want to keep out competition and fix prices, which is why (as you'll see in that thread) U.S. cost are higher and there is less coverage.
I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.