I find it funny that now that the Wii is by far the weakest graphical console, that suddenly every Wii owner is saying: 'oh graphics are good enough as they are, further improvement is really just a tiny thing at this point.'
Also if you can't see what a huge leap there is between last gen graphics and this gen then you really are either lying to yourself or not looking hard enough. Just check a game such as Resident Evil 4 which by last gen standards was a great looking game, but in about two years it's already totally outdated looking and we're still in the beginning of this generation.
If games like Gears, Unreal, Call of Duty, Mass Effect and others can be done this early in the generation can you even imagine what the games are gonna look and play like at the end?
Also, saying that graphics is the only difference between what 360 and PS3 games can do and Wii games is totally ignoring all the other things that are totally impossible on Wii and possible on those other two consoles because of the power under the hood.
Edit: Also, I seem to notice a trend lately that keeps trying to say that 360 and PS3 are both FPS consoles. Look at the lineup of big games for both consoles for the rest of the year, the majority are not FPS games and are either RPG/Action or Adventure type games.
13-15 year old audience huh? So I guess all the people playing Halo who are of all ages much older than that are made up...
Thanks to Blacksaber for the sig!
