By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - GTA IV demonstrates HD console userbase desperation

Grey Acumen said:

Reasonable said:
Only PS3/360 owners worried about Wii and banging on about GTA are a tiny hardcore minority who see Wii sales as a slight for 'their' console and 'their' types of games.*1

You yourself in defending the Wii as you do seem to come close to showing a similar bias - for example you mention Wii as having a 'superior' control style. *2

For some games? Sure, for all? In general? Come on don't be silly. For example for FPS or anything requiring very high precision nothing exceeds a keyboard and mouse. *3

My point is you're reading way too much in your second section on a minority. The majority of 360/PS3 owners want games/experiences that I would argue the Wii is not well designed to support - GTA is probably the big example right now, but basically I'm thinking narrative, PC like games (because in truth if you look at most big hitters on 360/PS3 they are essentially derivative of years of trends on PCs.) that have a preset bar for graphics, etc. due to their roots on PCs. Take Bioshock (which I played on PC but I've seen is pretty similar on 360) for example. Sure it could be on Wii with lower res textures, etc. But playing it like that would seem like a step back for the very gamers who like that type of game. This is my first gen as a true console owner (I come from PC gaming background) but what I can see that is truly different this gen is that the Wii and 360/PS3 are really offering very different experiences - particularly when you consider how PS3/360 cater to media centre use as well. I have a PS3 and will be getting a Wii in June. They will sit in seperate rooms (the PS3 hooked up to an HD TV, the Wii to a large CRT TV) and both will get good, but very different, use. *4

3) The Wii hasn't in my opinion 'changed the game' as drastically as many claim, particularly with regards to HD consoles. Its simply tapping a different market. From what I see Wii owners fall into two main camps - the Nintendo loyal who probably had GC, etc. and the so called 'casual market' - i.e. parents buying for children. 80% of Wil owners I know bought it for their children. Just as 80% of PS2 owners I know bought it for their children. What it has changed is two things - one, unlike PS2 its increased family gaming (i.e. mom and dad playing too) and two, its brought in new conepts such as Wii Fit and motion control for certain game types. As I mention in my previous point what the HD consoles offer with games like GTA, Halo, Bioshock, etc. is not under threat from Wii - likewise what Wii offers is not under threat from those consoles.

4) The title of your thread is pretty poor choice of words and does not really reflect the good points you raise in the body of the post *5

5) I'd be very interested to know who (if anyone) made a choice of Wii vs 360 vs PS3. Everyone I know with a Wii considered only that option. Everyone I know with a 360 or PS3 considered only those two consoles. I actually don't know anyone who compared them all at the same time and then chose one over the other. This may just be the demographic I've been exposed to - but I get the feeling that mostly they appeal to different demographics. The Wii is in the position of appealing to the largest demographic (as the PS2 did before it) while the 360 and PS3 appeal to a smaller (although if you add their sales and compare total HD consoles purchase to Wii it does raise possibility that the market is spilt pretty evenly at that level) but probably more vocal demographic *6


Overall a good post, but I'd avoid going for an attention grabbing title next time and try and avoid basing too much on minority stances vs the larger majority. As you correctly state for example majority of Wii owners probably never look at a single review at all.

*1 - Pretty much

*2 - I don't recall having said anywhere in the OP that I consider Wii controls to be superior, I do consider them superior, but in the OP I merely noted that it was a new skill set that is completely different than pressing buttons. Buttons have 2 states, pressed and not pressed. These are easily verified for whether they were pressed accurately as the conditions are black and white. Motion recognition has a much greater shade of gray to it that I have heard numerous reviewers complaining about the controls for, when I have personally experienced ZERO issues.

*3 - I do consider PROPERLY IMPLEMENTED Wii controls to be better than any straight joypad setup, the issue is finding those games that properly implement the controls. They've only been around for 18 months, and as I pointed out before, wether they work is not a black and white standard, so it is not only more difficult to use them, but also more difficult to design them. It will take time for motion controls to be refined and perfected, but there are already cases in which they are at least equivalent. Also, Wii pointer does have just as much precision as mouse, its just that it's harder to keep your arm still when it's not resting on a table which has friction to keep the mouse stuck on the location that you move it to.

*4 - you apparently got hung up on something here. The second half of my OP wasn't revolving around the PS3 or 360 reaction to the Wii at all, but to each other. This was focusing on the numerous arguments revolving around whether the 360 or the PS3 was the better version as well as all the minor issues brought up to attempt to prove the stances.

*5 - People are looking at it and posting, even if some people aren't actually reading the entire post, however their arguments help keep the thread alive for those who are actually going to read the whole way through and see the point. The title is accurate, but merely draws on a little hyperbole and doesn't worry about diplomacy. But as I've already pointed out, if I said I was so hungry I could eat a horse, and then discussed how I wanted a hamburger and not a horse to eat, it does not make the opening statement inaccurate.

*6 - I have considered getting a 360, a PS3 and a Wii at various points in my decision making process. I still consider getting a PS3. The reason why I picked the Wii was because it offered me numerous things right off the bat that PS3 and 360 could not offer, including the quality assurance of games made by nintendo, the focus on motion controls that push for more than just half assed implementation (even if some developers still do half assed anyway) and a lower price range

Million said:
Grey Acumen said:
Million said:
@ Grey Acumen

YOU IDIOT I DON'T EVEN HAVE A CAT !!!!!
Dog? Hamster? Ferret? Parakeet? Chicken? Pet rock?

WRONG AGAIN, I DON'T HAVE ANY PETS !!!.

Trainable younger sibling? :P

Onyxmeth said:

As a warning, I only read the original topic and have decided to skip what I can bet is 3 pages of bickering.

[Many points]

Sorry for anyone unfortunate enough to read this incohesive response. Hopefully somebody gets something from it.

Lets see *ticks off points* was able to read through the first post, apparently doesn't insert critisism where none was made, defends GTA IV simply by saying "problem issues are minor and inherent to that type of game, so should detract" supported this stance by, and avoided being hypocritical, by pointing out that another game with similarly noted issues should have been judged similarly...

 I don't see anything incohesive about this at all.


Just for clarity (and thanks for reading my long reply in turn).

 1 - we're in agreement

 2 - perhaps it wasn't your intention but you did mention 'superior'  - doesn't bother me personally but I know others will respond negatively too it and thought I'd point it out.  It's best when calling out others fanboy attitudes to carefully avoid anything that could be misconstrued in your own use of words.

3 - Well implemented Wii controls are indeed fantastic - although to be pedantic I will note it is impossible IMHO for even the best implemented Wii to match the precision of a mouse for input : it simply does not have the ability to register fine enough movements and the act of holding it in your arm will introduce further tremors.  This would only really matter in a fast paced MP FPS and I only mentioned it in the same light as 2 above - pointing out that no single console or input device is the best in all circumstances.

4 - the title didn't bother me personally but I can tell you its not a well chosen turn of phrase.  The proof is in the responses of others who barely read your post as they latched onto the title and went off ranting about that.  The fault is partly theirs but again as advice, when you have good points take care your title doesn't have any inflamatory or easy to misinterpret words to avoid this happening.  Desperate is a very strong word and care should be used with it.  Again, my intention here is advice not a personal reaction.

5 -  this is an interesting thread but I'd say your title is not quite as accurate as you're defending it to be.  For example it doesn't really include anything about the review situation you fairly mention and which I agree with.  But of course everyone uses their own turn of phrase but I think the evidence, as touched on above in point 5, is that the title is not being read as intended, which is a pretty strong clue that its not achieving what you seem to want - it is eye catching though, so perhaps that makes up for it!

6 - thaks for your views on purchasing.  I think when we compare consoles this generation it is vital to understand that right now no one console offers everything for everyone and that is part of what's making things so interesting this time around.

 



Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...

the audience of a review is a hardcore gamer.
the review is good for the hardcore gamer.
If you read the review and judge based on it, chances are your a hardcore gamer.
Why complicate things? so, lets say brawl is better for casual gamers than counterstrike or something. the reviews targeted towards hardcore gamers...



 

 

TheRealMafoo said:
Grey Acumen said:
TheRealMafoo said:
Grey Acumen said:

Ratings already cater to those stupid enough to think that a 10 actually makes it a perfect game even if it has flaws, and use those scores in attempt to show that Wii have lower quality games, and that one game is better than another despite obvious differences in focus.


So who has a chip on there shoulder? You thinking this right here, is why I started entering this thread in the first place. I have read all the reviews for GTA, and in none of them have I ever seen the word Wii. The only people threatened by GTA getting a 10, is Wii owners. (not saying all Wii owners, as I own a Wii :p). The rest of the world is just playing the game. *1

*1 - Nope sorry, that's YOUR thinking, not mine. I didn't refer to GTA IV and in actual fact, I had OoT, GTA IV, as well as any other 10 scored game grouped into that category when I mentioned it.


So you were also talking about a game you can buy on the Wii (OoT) when you said people use scores to show that the Wii has lower quality games?*1

Yea, I am buying that. You specifically stated in the thread title that you were referring to HD console userbase, and only one game that qualifies there has gotten a 10. *2

I hope when you talk, you are doing so to convince yourself of something, because you are convincing no one else. *3

Dude, the amount of word twisting you are doing is outright mind boggling. I have trouble forming an argument not because you're making any real point, but because I am finding it impossible to track down where in the thread you've drawn your conclusions from without winding up with my head up your ass, cause that's the only place I'm managing to find them.

*1 - No, I wasn't, I don't know where you got this from, I was reffering to people who are stupid enough to believe that a 10 rating for a game is proof that it is better than other games with lower rankings. The part about scores being used to try to compare consoles uses ALL scores, or at least a range of scores, say 7-10.

*2 - Other scores exist besides 10, just FYI. 10 is just a number that establishes a standard from which to work from since it is the highest score possible, sort of how it helps to use black and white when comparing shades of gray.

*3 - Well, taking a look back, I've apparently been convincing some 20+ people who have actually taken a step back and realized that this thread isn't about GTA IV, something like 80% of the unique users who have posted in this thread? Unless there's someone with the username "no one else" that is also being convinced by this thread...

im_sneaky said:
the audience of a review is a hardcore gamer.
the review is good for the hardcore gamer.
If you read the review and judge based on it, chances are your a hardcore gamer.
Why complicate things? so, lets say brawl is better for casual gamers than counterstrike or something. the reviews targeted towards hardcore gamers...

You do have a good point, but that's still exclusionary thinking. There's a new audience, and this new audience has the potential to be bigger and more infuencial than the already existing audience. the opportunity is there to adapt to the new audience while still retaining the old audience, but if that opportunity is passed up, it makes it more likely that the new audience will eventually replace the old audience.
The attitude that you have to be either casual OR hardcore is actually making people focus on one type of gaming advancement at the expense of the other, when what would make a really great game is to have both of these advancements in a game.



Seppukuties is like LBP Lite, on crack. Play it already!

Currently wrapped up in: Half Life, Portal, and User Created Source Mods
Games I want: (Wii)Mario Kart, Okami, Bully, Conduit,  No More Heroes 2 (GC) Eternal Darkness, Killer7, (PS2) Ico, God of War1&2, Legacy of Kain: SR2&Defiance


My Prediction: Wii will be achieve 48% market share by the end of 2008, and will achieve 50% by the end of june of 09. Prediction Failed.

<- Click to see more of her

 

TheRealMafoo said:

 


For example, when GTA got a 10, everyone with SMG didn't think "Well, is scored higher then SMG, and I love that game, so I must go get an HD console and buy this game!" No, they realized the audience it's for, the kind of game it was, and made there own individual assessment. 


I have to agree with this. We certainly wouldn't see anyone reasonably intelligent making a thread comparind, say, GTA4 to OoT and saying one was better than the other. The person would just realize the games are of two completely different genres, and cater to two completely different audiences and leave it at that. There certainly wouldn't be a 3 page flame fest where at the end the poster runs off because he is tired of being told he is wrong. No one mildly intelligent would ever do that, right?



Starcraft 2 ID: Gnizmo 229

I don't think anyone understands that this game has been near perfection since GTA3 came out. Why people want to take this as an attack on the Wii is beyond me.

No, HD consoles don't NEED GTAIV to be a huge hit. Its a huge hit because of what it tries to deliver, and successfully delivers on. None of the reviews say "man, the Wii so can't do this." Its a review on the amount of content, the attention to detail, the superb graphics, the plot, the fighting system, and characters of the game. This game is just that much better than the previous GTA games, so why doesn't it deserve a 10/10? If you aren't going to give it a 10/10, what could you POSSIBLY blame that on? This game does nothing wrong.

I think this is another push for the Wii to be legitimate and important to the gaming world. Its a casual only console, and its popularity is justified by its software lineup. Everyone here knows it deep inside. Take away motion controls and just add a standard rumbling controller and I doubt anyone here would really think the Wii would be in the top position. The PS3/360 just have better games and GTAIV is the result of more processing power and years developing to perfect an already nearly perfect game.

I wouldn't think mario fans would see this as a perfect game. But clearly the millions upon millions of people who bought this game first day do believe its worth all that so I don't understand the issue. A 10/10 to me means the game succeeds above whats expected in every aspect of the game. Anyone who plays the game (who actually likes the series/genre) will tell you that this game blows your mind from start to finish. Its not perfect, but can any game ever be perfect for everyone?

Theres no conspiracy against the Wii. In fact, no one cares about the Wii. It's there, it sells a lot, but its proven that its not a threat to HD gaming since records have been smashed all throughout this generation by all three consoles. GTA isn't some secret plan to take down Nintendo. It just turns out that while Nintendo dominates console sales, Rockstar has crafted the best game of all time. Nothing against the Wii, nothing to do with the Wii. Maybe people should stop making issues where none are. Post like these just show the desperation of the Wii crowd. Could this be the death of the Wii? Will it take those grandmas, grandpas, 8 year old kids and group of girls who never play video games but fell in love with Wii sports? No. But the HD console generation has been very boring in terms of video games. This is a boost to those consoles. Its all on the Wii whether or not it can sustain its numbers. All thats happened is now mainstream gamers (madden, gta players) now have a definitive reason to buy a next gen HD console over a Wii. That reason is GTA.



Are Wii owners still crying for GTA4 ... I thaught that SSBB and SMG was enough :?



Vote the Mayor for Mayor!

hunter_alien said:
Are Wii owners still crying for GTA4 ... I thaught that SSBB and SMG was enough :?

I am glad you decided to post without even skimming the OP for any kind of context. You are adding serious depth to this conversation with completely uninformed one liners that are in no way relevant to any conversation happening in this thread.



Starcraft 2 ID: Gnizmo 229

Grey Acumen said:
TheRealMafoo said:
Grey Acumen said:
TheRealMafoo said:
Grey Acumen said:

Ratings already cater to those stupid enough to think that a 10 actually makes it a perfect game...


*1 - Nope sorry, that's YOUR thinking, not mine. I didn't refer to GTA IV and in actual fact, I had OoT, GTA IV, as well as any other 10 scored game grouped into that category when I mentioned it.

Yea, I am buying that. You specifically stated in the thread title that you were referring to HD console userbase, and only one game that qualifies there has gotten a 10. *2

*2 - Other scores exist besides 10, just FYI. 10 is just a number that establishes a standard from which to work from since it is the highest score possible, sort of how it helps to use black and white when comparing shades of gray.


 So you use the number 10, I reply, you reply, I reply, you then tell me what 10 means? What?

We obviously have a communication problem here. I will tell you what I think in clear words, and then walk away from this thread. 

I am in this thread for one reason. Not to talk about GTA, or talk about a rating system, but to talk about your frame of mind when you made this post.

You made a post that's thread title is obviously derogatory to the HD console user-base. The flavor of this thread is that somehow scores are misrepresentative because a game like GTA has outscored every game on the Wii, and probably will outscore every game for a long while now. This entire post exists as a reaction to a review. It's an attempt to get your views out based on what this review might do to the industry. What this game might do to the industry.

That's an act of desperation. If you look at my very first post. It's all I talked about. It was about how hypocritical this thread is. Not to mention how arrogant and condescending you can be. We can leave that for anther thread ;)



Gnizmo said:
TheRealMafoo said:

 


For example, when GTA got a 10, everyone with SMG didn't think "Well, is scored higher then SMG, and I love that game, so I must go get an HD console and buy this game!" No, they realized the audience it's for, the kind of game it was, and made there own individual assessment. 


I have to agree with this. We certainly wouldn't see anyone reasonably intelligent making a thread comparind, say, GTA4 to OoT and saying one was better than the other. The person would just realize the games are of two completely different genres, and cater to two completely different audiences and leave it at that. There certainly wouldn't be a 3 page flame fest where at the end the poster runs off because he is tired of being told he is wrong. No one mildly intelligent would ever do that, right?


Sorry, not the same thing. You are trying to use this context to poke fun at a reactionary post I posted? Funny. That post was in reaction to everyone being pissed off that GTA4 was getting 10's, when it was not as good as OoT. Why were you not jumping down there throats with your commentary on review systems?

It's funny how much BS people let other people get away with when they happen to have the same ultimate view. If I wrote this OP with the exact same bias put on Nintendo consoles, and I titled it "SMG demonstrates Wii userbase desperation", I would being fighting the opposite people.



TheRealMafoo said:
Gnizmo said:

I have to agree with this. We certainly wouldn't see anyone reasonably intelligent making a thread comparind, say, GTA4 to OoT and saying one was better than the other. The person would just realize the games are of two completely different genres, and cater to two completely different audiences and leave it at that. There certainly wouldn't be a 3 page flame fest where at the end the poster runs off because he is tired of being told he is wrong. No one mildly intelligent would ever do that, right?


Sorry, not the same thing. You are trying to use this context to poke fun at a reactionary post I posted? Funny. That post was in reaction to everyone being pissed off that GTA4 was getting 10's, when it was not as good as OoT. Why were you not jumping down there throats with your commentary on review systems?

It's funny how much BS people let other people get away with when they happen to have the same ultimate view. If I wrote this OP with the exact same bias put on Nintendo consoles, and I titled it "SMG demonstrates Wii userbase desperation", I would being fighting the opposite people.

If we're talking about the Wow, we sure have some rabid OoT fans thread, then that makes it all the more hilarious:

TheRealMafoo said:

Ok, I get that a lot of people are upset about GTA4 getting a better overall review score then OoT, but to then try and combat that by releasing a new review of OoT and giving it a 10?

Thanks for reviewing a 10 year old game... your a little late :p

http://www.gamerankings.com/itemrankings/singleitem.asp?itemid=197771&sort=1

http://www.gamerankings.com/itemrankings/launchreview.asp?reviewid=932613

Of course, when you actually follow the link, you'll see that this latest review was posted on 4-12-08, which is a solid 2 1/2 weeks before GTA IV's 4-29-08 release date. Apparently, Nintendo fans have mastered time travel and this reviewer is a Terminator unit sent back in the past to steal GTA IV's thunder of getting a 10.

Maybe... just maybe, TheRealMafoo, you should consider the possibilty that you are just a teensy bit overly defensive on the subject of GTA IV and its 10 rating. Seriously, I'm actually a little worried about you right now, it's not healthy. Go play the game and relax.



Seppukuties is like LBP Lite, on crack. Play it already!

Currently wrapped up in: Half Life, Portal, and User Created Source Mods
Games I want: (Wii)Mario Kart, Okami, Bully, Conduit,  No More Heroes 2 (GC) Eternal Darkness, Killer7, (PS2) Ico, God of War1&2, Legacy of Kain: SR2&Defiance


My Prediction: Wii will be achieve 48% market share by the end of 2008, and will achieve 50% by the end of june of 09. Prediction Failed.

<- Click to see more of her