Grey Acumen said:
*1 - Pretty much *2 - I don't recall having said anywhere in the OP that I consider Wii controls to be superior, I do consider them superior, but in the OP I merely noted that it was a new skill set that is completely different than pressing buttons. Buttons have 2 states, pressed and not pressed. These are easily verified for whether they were pressed accurately as the conditions are black and white. Motion recognition has a much greater shade of gray to it that I have heard numerous reviewers complaining about the controls for, when I have personally experienced ZERO issues. *3 - I do consider PROPERLY IMPLEMENTED Wii controls to be better than any straight joypad setup, the issue is finding those games that properly implement the controls. They've only been around for 18 months, and as I pointed out before, wether they work is not a black and white standard, so it is not only more difficult to use them, but also more difficult to design them. It will take time for motion controls to be refined and perfected, but there are already cases in which they are at least equivalent. Also, Wii pointer does have just as much precision as mouse, its just that it's harder to keep your arm still when it's not resting on a table which has friction to keep the mouse stuck on the location that you move it to. *4 - you apparently got hung up on something here. The second half of my OP wasn't revolving around the PS3 or 360 reaction to the Wii at all, but to each other. This was focusing on the numerous arguments revolving around whether the 360 or the PS3 was the better version as well as all the minor issues brought up to attempt to prove the stances. *5 - People are looking at it and posting, even if some people aren't actually reading the entire post, however their arguments help keep the thread alive for those who are actually going to read the whole way through and see the point. The title is accurate, but merely draws on a little hyperbole and doesn't worry about diplomacy. But as I've already pointed out, if I said I was so hungry I could eat a horse, and then discussed how I wanted a hamburger and not a horse to eat, it does not make the opening statement inaccurate. *6 - I have considered getting a 360, a PS3 and a Wii at various points in my decision making process. I still consider getting a PS3. The reason why I picked the Wii was because it offered me numerous things right off the bat that PS3 and 360 could not offer, including the quality assurance of games made by nintendo, the focus on motion controls that push for more than just half assed implementation (even if some developers still do half assed anyway) and a lower price range
Trainable younger sibling? :P
Lets see *ticks off points* was able to read through the first post, apparently doesn't insert critisism where none was made, defends GTA IV simply by saying "problem issues are minor and inherent to that type of game, so should detract" supported this stance by, and avoided being hypocritical, by pointing out that another game with similarly noted issues should have been judged similarly... I don't see anything incohesive about this at all. |
Just for clarity (and thanks for reading my long reply in turn).
1 - we're in agreement
2 - perhaps it wasn't your intention but you did mention 'superior' - doesn't bother me personally but I know others will respond negatively too it and thought I'd point it out. It's best when calling out others fanboy attitudes to carefully avoid anything that could be misconstrued in your own use of words.
3 - Well implemented Wii controls are indeed fantastic - although to be pedantic I will note it is impossible IMHO for even the best implemented Wii to match the precision of a mouse for input : it simply does not have the ability to register fine enough movements and the act of holding it in your arm will introduce further tremors. This would only really matter in a fast paced MP FPS and I only mentioned it in the same light as 2 above - pointing out that no single console or input device is the best in all circumstances.
4 - the title didn't bother me personally but I can tell you its not a well chosen turn of phrase. The proof is in the responses of others who barely read your post as they latched onto the title and went off ranting about that. The fault is partly theirs but again as advice, when you have good points take care your title doesn't have any inflamatory or easy to misinterpret words to avoid this happening. Desperate is a very strong word and care should be used with it. Again, my intention here is advice not a personal reaction.
5 - this is an interesting thread but I'd say your title is not quite as accurate as you're defending it to be. For example it doesn't really include anything about the review situation you fairly mention and which I agree with. But of course everyone uses their own turn of phrase but I think the evidence, as touched on above in point 5, is that the title is not being read as intended, which is a pretty strong clue that its not achieving what you seem to want - it is eye catching though, so perhaps that makes up for it!
6 - thaks for your views on purchasing. I think when we compare consoles this generation it is vital to understand that right now no one console offers everything for everyone and that is part of what's making things so interesting this time around.
Try to be reasonable... its easier than you think...