There is a guy on Twitter going by the handle APISAK, who posts information that has been discovered in 3D Mark databases for unannounced chipsets. APISAK found an AMD chipset named Gonzalo that matches up to confirmed info about PS5's chipset from the interview with Mark Cerny. APISAK also provided proof that both PS4's and PS4 Pro's chipsets were tested in 3D Mark on PC before release. 

The Gonzalo was first listed in January 2019, listed as an engineering sample. This new listing is a for a qualification sample, which means that it is near final silicon. Here are the specs that were pulled from the new listing:

• CPU- 8 core Ryzen, 1.6 ghz base clock, 3.2 ghz boost clock
• GPU- 1.8 ghz
• TDP- 95 watt

Unfortunately, we are still missing RAM information, and we are missing 1 key piece of information needed to determine the tflops of the GPU, the CU count. Digital Foundry provided a possible tflop range based on the 1.8ghz clock, ranging from 36 CU's like PS4 Pro, all the way up to 60 CU's like AMD's current highest end PC GPU, Radeon 7, and that range is 8.3-13.8 tflops. Digital Foundry says to expect less than 60 CU's for sure, citing cost, heat, and yields as reasons why a high CU count are unlikely. DF says to expect between 10 and 12 tflop.

The 14.7 was for the the max CU's possible on the GCN architecture, 64 CU's. Highly unlikely we would ever see a console with 64's CU's, issues with yields alone would drive the price through the roof. Radeon 7 has 60 CU's and it costs $700 right now. 

That pastebin leak is super fake:

-14 tflops is just not possible for a console, especially for the $450 price the leaker mentions.

-No way GTA 6 is 2020, we have reliable Rockstar leakers saying that Bully 2 is their next game and that GTA 6 won't release until 2022 or 2023. 

-I highly doubt that Battlefield Bad Company 3 is 2020. For starters, there are rumors that EA is about to announce big layoffs at Bioware and DICE in the wake of Anthem and Battlefield V's Battle Royale mode under-performing, including the closing of DICE Los Angeles. Secondly, a DICE design director posted a message recently saying that DICE was moving away from frequent sequels and paid DLC, to a model where new Battlefield and Battlefront will release every 3-4 years instead of every 2 years, with longer DLC support for each game. Battlefield Bad Company 3 in 2020, 2 years after Battlefield V, goes directly against what he said. 

-No way Gran Turismo 7 is 2020. Polyphony are notoriously slow developers, no way they can make GT7 in 3 years.

That pastebin leak is super fake:

-14 tflops is just not possible for a console, especially for the $450 price the leaker mentions.

-No way GTA 6 is 2020, we have reliable Rockstar leakers saying that Bully 2 is their next game and that GTA 6 won't release until 2022 or 2023. 

-I highly doubt that Battlefield Bad Company 3 is 2020. For starters, there are rumors that EA is about to announce big layoffs at Bioware and DICE in the wake of Anthem and Battlefield V's Battle Royale mode under-performing, including the closing of DICE Los Angeles. Secondly, a DICE design director posted a message recently saying that DICE was likely moving away from frequent sequels and paid season passes, to a model where new Battlefield and Battlefront will release every 3-4 years instead of every 2 years, with longer DLC support for each game. Battlefield Bad Company 3 in 2020, 2 years after Battlefield V, goes directly against what he said. 

-No way Gran Turismo 7 is 2020. Polyphony are notoriously slow developers, no way they can make GT7 in 3 years.

I can't see that happening. Navi 10 is a replacement for Polaris 30. Polaris 30 is a 7 tflop chip with 36 CU's, so 13 tflops and 60 CU's would be nearly double it's predecessor. AMD has never managed to release a new GPU generation with a performance improvement of more than 1.5x over the previous generation afaik. For instance, Polaris 30, RX 590, offered a 1.4x improvement in flops over the previous generation GPU it replaced, the R9 390.

How so? If AMD can manage to pull off a 1.5x improvement again, that would put Navi 10 at 10.6 tflops, which is within the 10-12 tflop range that Digital Foundry says to expect for PS5 in the video. If they can pull off a 1.6x improvement, which they have never done before to my knowledge, but might be possible since they have been working on Navi for nearly 3 years since Polaris released, that would put Navi 10 at 11.4 tflops (very close to the 11.1 tflop 48 compute unit number in the video). 

All I'm saying is, keep your expectations in check. Better to be pleasantly surprised if AMD does pull off a big improvement for Navi 10 over it's predecessor, than to be disappointed because you are expecting high end performance numbers from a mid-range chipset. 

There is nothing in that article about how many CU's Navi 10 will have, or how many tflops. It says that Navi 10 will have a 1.8 ghz clock rate, the exact same as the AMD Gonzalo chip, but without knowing the CU count you can't determine the tflops. 

What that article does say is this:

"With reference pricing of $259, RX Vega 56/GTX 1080 (tier) performance would give Radeon a huge advantage over Nvidia in the mid-range of the GPU market, easily surpassing their Turing-based GTX 1660 Ti, which has an MSRP of $279."

OC3D is expecting Vega 56/GTX 1080 tier performance from Navi 10 in other words. Vega 56 is a 10.5 tflop GPU, which falls almost exactly in line with the 1.5x improvement over Polaris 30 I said to expect for Navi 10. 

Also, I just found this in a PC Gamer article about Navi:

"Looking at the Vega 64 vs. Radeon VII core size, we can get at least a reasonable estimate of what can be done. Vega 10 (Vega 64) at 14nm is a 486mm^2 die with 12.5 billion transistors, Vega 20 (Radeon VII) at 7nm is a 331mm^2 die with 13.2 billion transistors. That's 32 percent smaller with 6 percent more transistors. With similar scaling, AMD could end up with a 200mm^2 die with 40-48 CUs (2560 to 3072 streaming cores). Toss in higher clockspeeds and lower power consumption, with more memory bandwidth thanks to GDDR6, and the top Navi 10 part could be competitive with RTX 2070."

PC Gamer says they are expecting between 40 and 48 CU's for Navi 10. Based on the scale in Digital Foundry's video, that would be 9.2 tflops for 40 CU's and 11.1 tflops for 48 CU's. So yeah, I wouldn't expect more than 11.1 tflop for PS5 if I was you, unless Sony decides to wait on Navi 20's release in 2020 instead of using Navi 10.