By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Jaicee said:
EricHiggin said:

Link doesn't seem to be working.

Try this link then, it's more direct.

Thx that worked.

I didn't know that only 12 hours prior he had pointed out that "is" should have been "if" in a Cuomo tweet. Now while he totally could have spelled Wales incorrectly without knowing so, Trump trolling like he does, could have very well done so on purpose to cause a stir. While I'd like to assume he just misspelled it, he's enough of a sh*t disturber that he just may have done it on purpose, whether he figured the outrage would be over the misspelling and it's tie to Cuomo, or it's 'hidden meaning' of the Queen being fat, much like calling Markle "nasty" apparently. With Trump it's pretty hard sometimes to know if he's really screwing with you or not in his tweets.



CaptainExplosion said:
Immersiveunreality said:

Yes indeed,it is cute you tie those two whole different things together.

They're not totally different. Both were war crimes that cost the lives of civilians, and since Russia's in Syria that means Putin gets to help Assad gas his own people even more.

Ergo, Putin is a war criminal just like Assad, so you can't say he's helping the actual civilians.

TallSilhouette said:

Trump blames the impending market crash not on tax cuts or trade wars, but on the chance of him losing re-election.

"Waa!! Democwats and poor people don't wike my tax cuts for the wich, oh my aiding in wawcwimes in Afwica, oh my cowusion with Wussia!! Waa!!"

He is not in bed with Amerika/Canada that's for sure and those two"freedom fighters" are not innocent of war crimes themselves but it is convenient they can use the hysteria on Russia in media,proof is also not needed but just enough headlines and parroting.

But be happy that besides the victim civilians from mistakes and warcrimes from soldiers there are also civilians being helped,it would be fairly illogical to think that Putin would actively target civilians that aren't rebels turning rogue.

Second bolded: That made me laugh but i do not know if that attitude will help you in getting the point across.



EricHiggin said:
Jaicee said:

Try this link then, it's more direct.

Thx that worked.

I didn't know that only 12 hours prior he had pointed out that "is" should have been "if" in a Cuomo tweet. Now while he totally could have spelled Wales incorrectly without knowing so, Trump trolling like he does, could have very well done so on purpose to cause a stir. While I'd like to assume he just misspelled it, he's enough of a sh*t disturber that he just may have done it on purpose, whether he figured the outrage would be over the misspelling and it's tie to Cuomo, or it's 'hidden meaning' of the Queen being fat, much like calling Markle "nasty" apparently. With Trump it's pretty hard sometimes to know if he's really screwing with you or not in his tweets.

Or it could be exactly what it is.  When a person shows you who they are you should believe them.  Trying to find the hidden lining is comical.  Trump continue to show you he is an idiot, and you continue to try to find some way to justify it.  Let me give you a hint.  If you look at Trump as the idiot he is, then view his tweets its very easy to see and know exactly what he is doing.  When you try to make something stupid appear deep or on another level is why you seem to have a problem.  

Even if Trump was trying to put some hidden meaning that the Queen is fat, it would still make him out to be an absolute idiot.  The question probably isn't that Trump is an idiot, its the question of how much.



RolStoppable said:
Machiavellian said:

Or it could be exactly what it is.  When a person shows you who they are you should believe them.  Trying to find the hidden lining is comical.  Trump continue to show you he is an idiot, and you continue to try to find some way to justify it.  Let me give you a hint.  If you look at Trump as the idiot he is, then view his tweets its very easy to see and know exactly what he is doing.  When you try to make something stupid appear deep or on another level is why you seem to have a problem.  

Even if Trump was trying to put some hidden meaning that the Queen is fat, it would still make him out to be an absolute idiot.  The question probably isn't that Trump is an idiot, its the question of how much.

What's comical is your insistence that an idiot could become president of the United States. That's even more farfetched than claiming that an idiot could become vice chancellor of Austria.

Lol, yes, an idiot can become president of the United States because we have Trump case in point.  If there was a test, that tested the intelligence level of the President you may have a point instead of an election that test the popularity of the President.  History have put idiots in position of power because they are easily manipulated so what make you believe that you have to actually be intelligent to become president.  I know a lot of people voted for Trump because he is a billionaire as if that was the measure of his intelligence.



Machiavellian said:
EricHiggin said:

Thx that worked.

I didn't know that only 12 hours prior he had pointed out that "is" should have been "if" in a Cuomo tweet. Now while he totally could have spelled Wales incorrectly without knowing so, Trump trolling like he does, could have very well done so on purpose to cause a stir. While I'd like to assume he just misspelled it, he's enough of a sh*t disturber that he just may have done it on purpose, whether he figured the outrage would be over the misspelling and it's tie to Cuomo, or it's 'hidden meaning' of the Queen being fat, much like calling Markle "nasty" apparently. With Trump it's pretty hard sometimes to know if he's really screwing with you or not in his tweets.

Or it could be exactly what it is.  When a person shows you who they are you should believe them.  Trying to find the hidden lining is comical.  Trump continue to show you he is an idiot, and you continue to try to find some way to justify it.  Let me give you a hint.  If you look at Trump as the idiot he is, then view his tweets its very easy to see and know exactly what he is doing.  When you try to make something stupid appear deep or on another level is why you seem to have a problem.  

Even if Trump was trying to put some hidden meaning that the Queen is fat, it would still make him out to be an absolute idiot.  The question probably isn't that Trump is an idiot, its the question of how much.

It could be, considering I mentioned twice that may be the case. Seems that you agree with that view of the situation.

Are you saying that something considered stupid by some, can't have deeper meaning?

Does this also mean Cuomo is an idiot for making a spelling mistake and every other person who does, or is everyone exempt from that except for Trump? If someone makes multiple spelling mistakes, is that showing me who they are, so I should believe that they are an idiot because they can't spell correctly 100% of the time?

If Trump was trying to put hidden meanings into things, it would be important to know what that meaning is, wouldn't it? It's not like he's the President or anything important right? If a foreign power gives Trump dirt on his opponent, knowing what the hidden arrangement and agreement between them is would be important don't you think, or is that not important since clearly Trump is too much of an idiot to play that game? If Trump is putting hidden meanings into his tweets, as well as making hidden deals with foreign enemies, and his opposition isn't realizing it or can't prove it, then who is the idiot with problems really?



EricHiggin said:

If Trump was trying to put hidden meanings into things, it would be important to know what that meaning is, wouldn't it? It's not like he's the President or anything important right? If a foreign power gives Trump dirt on his opponent, knowing what the hidden arrangement and agreement between them is would be important don't you think, or is that not important since clearly Trump is too much of an idiot to play that game? If Trump is putting hidden meanings into his tweets, as well as making hidden deals with foreign enemies, and his opposition isn't realizing it or can't prove it, then who is the idiot with problems really?

What exactly is your implication here? Any way I read this seems absolutely ridiculous so I just want to ask you to spell it out for me before I make any assumptions.



RolStoppable said:
Machiavellian said:

Or it could be exactly what it is.  When a person shows you who they are you should believe them.  Trying to find the hidden lining is comical.  Trump continue to show you he is an idiot, and you continue to try to find some way to justify it.  Let me give you a hint.  If you look at Trump as the idiot he is, then view his tweets its very easy to see and know exactly what he is doing.  When you try to make something stupid appear deep or on another level is why you seem to have a problem.  

Even if Trump was trying to put some hidden meaning that the Queen is fat, it would still make him out to be an absolute idiot.  The question probably isn't that Trump is an idiot, its the question of how much.

What's comical is your insistence that an idiot could become president of the United States. That's even more farfetched than claiming that an idiot could become vice chancellor of Austria.

What do you mean, *could*? Seen who's POTUS lately?



Machiavellian said:
RolStoppable said:

What's comical is your insistence that an idiot could become president of the United States. That's even more farfetched than claiming that an idiot could become vice chancellor of Austria.

Lol, yes, an idiot can become president of the United States because we have Trump case in point.  If there was a test, that tested the intelligence level of the President you may have a point instead of an election that test the popularity of the President.  History have put idiots in position of power because they are easily manipulated so what make you believe that you have to actually be intelligent to become president.  I know a lot of people voted for Trump because he is a billionaire as if that was the measure of his intelligence.

Oooooor he might be lower skilled at some things while being highly skilled on others.

You know ,like real life people? :p



Immersiveunreality said:
Machiavellian said:

Lol, yes, an idiot can become president of the United States because we have Trump case in point.  If there was a test, that tested the intelligence level of the President you may have a point instead of an election that test the popularity of the President.  History have put idiots in position of power because they are easily manipulated so what make you believe that you have to actually be intelligent to become president.  I know a lot of people voted for Trump because he is a billionaire as if that was the measure of his intelligence.

Oooooor he might be lower skilled at some things while being highly skilled on others.

You know ,like real life people? :p

True, I have seen some people who are good at somethings and complete idiots at others.  I will say that Trump is a low tier grifter which is his true calling.  He is the ultimate BS artist and probably would be great as a door to door salesman or member of congress.  What I have not seen is this vaunted business IQ but maybe the people who do believe he is intelligent can show some demonstrations of his ability.



EricHiggin said:
Machiavellian said:

Or it could be exactly what it is.  When a person shows you who they are you should believe them.  Trying to find the hidden lining is comical.  Trump continue to show you he is an idiot, and you continue to try to find some way to justify it.  Let me give you a hint.  If you look at Trump as the idiot he is, then view his tweets its very easy to see and know exactly what he is doing.  When you try to make something stupid appear deep or on another level is why you seem to have a problem.  

Even if Trump was trying to put some hidden meaning that the Queen is fat, it would still make him out to be an absolute idiot.  The question probably isn't that Trump is an idiot, its the question of how much.

It could be, considering I mentioned twice that may be the case. Seems that you agree with that view of the situation.

Are you saying that something considered stupid by some, can't have deeper meaning?

Does this also mean Cuomo is an idiot for making a spelling mistake and every other person who does, or is everyone exempt from that except for Trump? If someone makes multiple spelling mistakes, is that showing me who they are, so I should believe that they are an idiot because they can't spell correctly 100% of the time?

If Trump was trying to put hidden meanings into things, it would be important to know what that meaning is, wouldn't it? It's not like he's the President or anything important right? If a foreign power gives Trump dirt on his opponent, knowing what the hidden arrangement and agreement between them is would be important don't you think, or is that not important since clearly Trump is too much of an idiot to play that game? If Trump is putting hidden meanings into his tweets, as well as making hidden deals with foreign enemies, and his opposition isn't realizing it or can't prove it, then who is the idiot with problems really?

Who cares about the spelling mistake, I have not chastised Trump on spelling mistakes, I make them all the time.  I chastise him for being incompetent idiot and it didn't start during his Presidency.  We can bring up hundreds of tweets that shows that he has no clue what he is doing.  No hidden meaning just dumb stupid ramblings.  We can show multiple speaking moments of him making very dumb ramblings and stupid insights into his mind. 

Naw, it really isn't important to know what hidden meaning he is trying to put into tweets.  Trying to run the country using tweets, using tweets for diplomatic relations is also stupid and dumb.  Its why his administration is in shambles and everyone is leaving.  You can continue to try to make idiotic things he does as somehow above the wisdom of everyone else but it will always just be you trying to find the silver lining in the idiotic.  If you believe people can find the intelligent out of the stupid, I am more than happy to listen to you try to make most of the dribble coming from Trump mouth into something intelligent.