By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/07/politics/mueller-comey-memos/index.html

Well there goes any assumptions that Mueller might leak. If he tried to stop Comey's leaks he's quite unlikely to leak himself.



Another school shooting. This is ridiculous.

https://coloradosun.com/2019/05/07/stem-school-shooting-highlands-ranch/



B O I

... but, Did the Dem Rep. have to copy Trump in saying acc'uemen too??



SpokenTruth said:

A list of former federal prosecutors (735 and growing) across decades of experience have co-signed a statement which proclaims that President Trump would be charged with obstruction of justice IF...if he were not president.  It is primarily the policy of the Department of Justice to not indict a sitting prescient (as noted in many statements, interviews and Mueller's own report). But all 735 (and growing) feel that sufficient evidence exists that would not only amount to charges but multiple convictions if Trump were not under the aforementioned policy protection.

Of the 735 listed, 341 have served 10 years or longer which suggests they were appointed and/or server under presidents of both parties. 176 served for 20 or more years. 71 served for 30 or more years.  These are not partisan hacks.  Some served across 7 to even 8 different presidencies.

They have a combined federal law knowledge of tens of thousands of years of experience. This is proof the Department of Justice is using policy rather than warrant and justification to defend the president and prevent an indictment.

Another case with big numbers like 30,000 emails agree's with you, except for the word proof. It's always the good one's that get away isn't it?



CaptainExplosion said:
LuccaCardoso1 said:
Another school shooting. This is ridiculous.

https://coloradosun.com/2019/05/07/stem-school-shooting-highlands-ranch/

And the NRA is to blame for these happening so often now, all because they refuse to give up their weapons.

Why isn't the NRA classified as a terrorist group?

As far as i'm aware no NRA member have committed a mass shooting. These shooters are just idiots who need help.



https://www.engadget.com/2019/05/08/senate-bill-bans-paid-loot-boxes/
People cried loud enough and now lootboxes might be gone.



jason1637 said:
CaptainExplosion said:

And the NRA is to blame for these happening so often now, all because they refuse to give up their weapons.

Why isn't the NRA classified as a terrorist group?

As far as i'm aware no NRA member have committed a mass shooting. These shooters are just idiots who need help.

They're worse than idiots who need help - they're idiots who need help with ridiculously easy access to guns.



B O I

LuccaCardoso1 said:
jason1637 said:

As far as i'm aware no NRA member have committed a mass shooting. These shooters are just idiots who need help.

They're worse than idiots who need help - they're idiots who need help with ridiculously easy access to guns.

But they're not killing anyone. I'd say a meass shooter is worse than a NRA member.



jason1637 said:
LuccaCardoso1 said:

They're worse than idiots who need help - they're idiots who need help with ridiculously easy access to guns.

But they're not killing anyone. I'd say a meass shooter is worse than a NRA member.

I was referring to mass shooters, not NRA members.

NRA does a disservice in the sense that they promote and glamourize guns, but they're obviously not as bad as literal mass shooters.



B O I

LuccaCardoso1 said:
jason1637 said:

But they're not killing anyone. I'd say a meass shooter is worse than a NRA member.

I was referring to mass shooters, not NRA members.

NRA does a disservice in the sense that they promote and glamourize guns, but they're obviously not as bad as literal mass shooters.

I see nothing wrong with promoting and glamourizing guns as long as you're not promoting gun violence against others.