don't know don't care
Will we ever get another 98+ game on Metacritic? | |||
Yes | 24 | 47.06% | |
No | 27 | 52.94% | |
Total: | 51 |
CaptainExplosion said:
^This, that fat piece of shit. |
He doesn't do reviews anymore and as much as I love Breath of the Wild, I'm not mad at him for liking it less than most. I really can't get behind hating a reviewer or a review outlet just because they give a "low" score to a game I love (provided the reasoning behind it makes sense of course).
Signature goes here!
pikashoe said:
Nah. Bad gunplay, ridiculously repetitive and restrictive missions, poor fast travel options and chapter 5 are enough to drag it down a point or two. |
Gunplay was fun,fast travel is a decision design so that you camp a lot and fell like outlaw travelling and care for your horse and they have succeed at it
The Game Have a lot of amazing things that makes you ignore it's negative,also This Game from what i have seen it's not for everyone,you need to play it slow to get the experience
Maybe
Hard cause:
- click bait reviewers
- more reviewers
- fanboy reviewers
- more reviewers from countries other than USA meaning they use the full scale (i.e. a 5 is a pass, in USA 7 is a pass)
Mr.Joker said:
Gunplay was fun,fast travel is a decision design so that you camp a lot and fell like outlaw travelling and care for your horse and they have succeed at it The Game Have a lot of amazing things that makes you ignore it's negative,also This Game from what i have seen it's not for everyone,you need to play it slow to get the experience |
The gunplay is completely brainless, probably the worst thing in the game, it's astonishing that a triple A release can get away with it in 2018. I like to do that sometimes but I also want to get to where I need to go at a decent pace. Which also brings up the point that moving around the world isn't particularly enjoyable either, with the crappy horse controls.
The game has a lot of fantastic things in it but they do not overcome the massive flaws with the game. I can see this game being re evaluated a lot in the future, it's already begun.
JRPGfan said:
I agree with this. |
I couldn't say it better, you really went straight to the point :P
Fallout4 "only" got an 87 on Meta, but I loved it, one of my most favourite game of this generation(very unpopular statement :D)
Metacritic just gives me an indication, then I have to try by myself, sorry if I say the obvious.
”Every great dream begins with a dreamer. Always remember, you have within you the strength, the patience, and the passion to reach for the stars to change the world.”
Harriet Tubman.
CaptainExplosion said:
Still, not bad for a game made by what almost counts as slavery. |
You can say the same for most games made in Japan.
I feel like any random Nintendo game can achieve it with the right amount of hype.
It'll happen again, at some point, I'm sure. We've seen games get close. RDR2 just recently got like a 97, right? When you get up that high, it's really just splitting hairs. If a few of those reviewers have a better breakfast, wake up to nicer weather, or whatever else might put them in a slightly happier place mentally…..bam, you got a 98.
Last of us 2 has a chance, but probably will be 95-97.
There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'