By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - NetEase Games Acquires Minority Stake in Quantic Dream

Chazore said:
DonFerrari said:

It shoes?. shows...

No, you consume "semi" with "don't". You need to understand that Semi doesn't mean "don't/no". consume? Do you mean confuse? Semi means you don't really like it, evidence of it is that you haven't played the newer ones.

They are doing good profit?. Their games haven't massively evolved the way P&C games haven't. No, I've seen them over the years, there is a big difference between seeing vs not seeing. Have you seem? Really? And have you seem by? Yes they are doing great profit, they have posted they breaking even on the 1st million sold in like one week. I'm still waiting on the list of the plenty of devs and the games they have made that are on similar scope but either equivalent in the genre or doing things much better. Will you mind sending it?

Because it answers the previous question, hence why I asked in the first place. 

You're the one that's getting super hostile over me looking forward to the devs taking a new change of pace, something which all sorts of artists like taking (like it or not). 

You are supposing they want to change, have you talked to any of them to see it?

All you're displaying is outwards hostility to someone wanting to see the devs taking a slightly new outlook and direction. You don't want that because you think it will ruin a design mechanic that hasn't changed all that much in years. Having a new outlook on something is good, rather than staying close minded and repeating the same thing over and over again. 

I'm taking your hostility for you complaining about their games, and demanding changes while not liking their games. There is a very big difference from a fan looking at how the game could evolve to someone that doesn't really like (semi liking couple games 10 years ago is nowhere a sign of liking or being a fan of their work) requesting change.

And if you make a third or forty accusation of hostility maybe it will stick and you can happily run to a mod. Have you reported yourself for your own hostility and ad hominem and "talk proper english"? I really liked that you couldn't see one typo from w to e (side by side on the keyboard, hint QWERTY) them makes one yourself on consume instead of probably confuse (which is quite different in typing) but I tried to understand what you meant.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

DonFerrari said:
Chazore said:

It shoes?. shows...

No, you consume "semi" with "don't". You need to understand that Semi doesn't mean "don't/no". consume? Do you mean confuse? Semi means you don't really like it, evidence of it is that you haven't played the newer ones.

They are doing good profit?. Their games haven't massively evolved the way P&C games haven't. No, I've seen them over the years, there is a big difference between seeing vs not seeing. Have you seem? Really? And have you seem by? Yes they are doing great profit, they have posted they breaking even on the 1st million sold in like one week. I'm still waiting on the list of the plenty of devs and the games they have made that are on similar scope but either equivalent in the genre or doing things much better. Will you mind sending it?

You are supposing they want to change, have you talked to any of them to see it?

I'm taking your hostility for you complaining about their games, and demanding changes while not liking their games. There is a very big difference from a fan looking at how the game could evolve to someone that doesn't really like (semi liking couple games 10 years ago is nowhere a sign of liking or being a fan of their work) requesting change.

And if you make a third or forty accusation of hostility maybe it will stick and you can happily run to a mod. Have you reported yourself for your own hostility and ad hominem and "talk proper english"? I really liked that you couldn't see one typo from w to e (side by side on the keyboard, hint QWERTY) them makes one yourself on consume instead of probably confuse (which is quite different in typing) but I tried to understand what you meant.

Thank you.

Confuse yes, a typo. No, semi's definition states "partially, somewhat", not "Don't really like it". You're trying to pair me not having played what you've played as a means to discredit my time spent with two of their games, which doesn't really work since it's subjective to even do so in the first place. 

Have you seem?, and have you seem by?, what does any of that even mean?. I'm not talking about profits made, so I'm not sure why you feel that has to be brought into the discussion, especially when talking about evolution in design.

Will you mind not acting so arrogant and hostile?. Right after that ban, you've been cutthroat with it, mind just admitting to it?, it makes things a lot more clear and easier to read. 

You think everyone wants to be the same forever all of a sudden?.

You're "taking my hostility" for me voicing about wanting to see change?. See to you, you feel this is some sort of threat to your enjoyment, when in reality it is not, which is why you've now decided to belittle and narrow down my opinion to "crying" and "complaining", to make your argument look both morally and superior in design, it's really not, it comes off as brash and highly defensive, especially with you" list devs that make games like this hmmn". 

There is a big difference between someone who looks back on something and how it's aged, and someone who constantly likes to wear rose tinted glasses and doesn't want to take any kind of criticism/feedback. 

Trying to make a massive and personal deal with "you're not a fan" isn't going to do anything here, except showing your hostility and personal beef. 

Yes, I'll continue making those claims, because so far, you've been quick to judge and quick to condemn someone who doesn't give your fave game the same level of obvious praise you think it deserves (it's called having an opinion).

If you want a mod brought to your attention, you'll be doing that job yourself. You clearly want a lot of attention brought to this little discussion between you and I, so much so that you're making the jabs more obvious. 

Have you noticed in this conversation that I haven'ed said "talk proper English", or are you bringing up an old post, on a site that's both hosted and run by an English party?. I can't believe you cannot make full sentences, without me having to ask what they actually mean. You trying to understand, does not mean I can understand what you type, we're not on the same level of understand for practically anything, if you hadn't already seen or guessed that by now. 



Step right up come on in, feel the buzz in your veins, I'm like an chemical electrical right into your brain and I'm the one who killed the Radio, soon you'll all see

So pay up motherfuckers you belong to "V"

 

twintail said:
Heavenly_King said:
this is really weird. Sony tried to buy them back then; and now they sell part of the company?? Why they did not do that back then??

Maybe they didnt want to be fully owned. Maybe they wanted to see what kind of support Sony would offer on their games. Maybe they just wanted to wait out their contract and then have the discussions.

Doesn't really matter. Sony don't even seem interested in buying companies atm, but rather just starting up new ones. Though I do think BluePoint would be a good get

Blue point would be awesome. PS could get amazing remakes XD (LEGEND OF DRAGOON!!!!)



CGI-Quality said:
flashfire926 said:
So Microsoft lost Remedy, while Sony lost Quantic Dream. I dont really know what to say, other than that it's great that more people will get access to their games, I guess.

I don't consider either of these losses. Both Microsoft and Sony had the option to purchase (particularly the latter, when David Cage mentioned he'd be fine with it an acquisition from them). They (MS + Sony) just may not have seen the benefit outweighing the cost and decided against it. We just don't know. But, I remember similar talk when Insomniac was developing Sunset Overdrive. Fast forward to 2019 and the notion has totally evaporated.

While it's nice to think of Sony MS or Nintendo buying studios that appear on the market. People were clamouring for Sony to buy Atlus  but Sony would have taken a pragmatic approach toward any purchase by doing a cost benefit analysis, one of the reasons we don't see platform holders running around buying up Companies like Atlus - Quantic Dream all the time is simply because they most likely will have the game on their platform regardless and unless your a minecraft and on basically everything at time of purchase, quite often the easiest way to grow these IP's is by putting them on multiple platforms,another factor is you don't have any surety regarding the talent, how many buyouts have seen key staff leave in the first couple of years.



Research shows Video games  help make you smarter, so why am I an idiot