And the hell why people are still cares about this shity games.

BF1 runs at 40fps on OG Xbox One and the COD BO4 beta ran at 45 fps. It's obvious that base consoles are way out of their depth halfway into this gen. I guarantee that BF5 and BO4 will run at max 50fps on base consoles. These games are made for the X. 

Doom 2016 runs at 25fps and falls down to 476p, it's unplayable. Wolfenstein 2 goes down to 360p. It blows my mind how people think the Switch can run any game post 2018 and expect it to be playable. It'll run horribly and won't be fun at all to play. 

Doom 2016 runs at 25fps and falls down to 476p, it's unplayable. Wolfenstein 2 goes down to 360p. It blows my mind how people think the Switch can run any game post 2018 and expect it to be playable. It'll run horribly and won't be fun at all to play. These cutbacks are too high, hell they gimped the audio for Doom for it to run on Switch. Games like these aren't meant to be played on Switch, it's horrible and is unplayable. It's like saying RDR 2 can run on my phone, maybe it can but would I want to play such a horrible representation of a game on hardware that can barely handle it? 

Doom and Wolfenstein didn't sell well on the Switch, that's just false. Definitely not the demographic and plus if these games run so horribly on the Switch, it wouldn't attract any part of the Switch consumer base. They haven't expressed enough interest for it and with how bad games run on the Switch I don't think they ever will. 

TBH this is one COD game I will not miss and will be the first one I skip since COD4. The campaign and local multiplayer are the only reasons I bought COD (at one stage on three systems the same game lol).

I enjoyed the wii's motion controls in campaign mode but what I loved the most was the Wii U version because I could sit there with a mate in the same room chat away in the same room. One on the TV and one on the tablet controller.

Games like Fifa, Skyrim, Minecraft, Rocket League...also you need to take in account than when we talk about big 3rd party games on Switch we talking mostly about late ports with full price of $60.

Effort!? They just hire someone like Panic Button to them port and they are done. For instance Doom for Switch sold around 500k probably and they bringing new Doom now alongside with other platforms, that basically means they made enough profit so they are willing to invest in further Switch ports. Porting is cheap (we talking about few millions investment), and you could make profit with only few hundred thousands copies sold. Like I wrote, CoD would easily hit at least 1m on Switch, and they would easily made solid profit on Switch. Also dont forget that CoD runs at 60 FPS on base XB1, so game could run at 30 FPS on Switch.

Crash Bandicoot is easier port definitely, but that doesnt mean that CoD dont make sense, of course that offer one of most strongest and popular IPs ever in full handheld mode and on platform that will be very successful platform, totally make sense, even when we know that even Wii and Wii U had multiply CoD games.

1 game, which you've shown no evidence of and a beta is far from "mostly"

Imagine the implications even if that was remotely correct.

If you reply can you please trim it? I'm on my phone. It's a nightmare to zoom in and trim.

While I do criticise Wolfenstein's performance on the Switch, saying that this kinds of games can't run on the Switch or that they won't be able to attract the core audience is not really true. Otherwise Bethesda wouldn't waste time and resources on Doom Eternal. If it was just a matter of Switch support, they could have just ported old PS360 titles and be done with it, but they took the gamble and it paid off.

I think this all comes down to optimization, which is the name of the game when it comes to Switch ports. Doom's sacrifices are just enough to make the positives worth it in the eyes of many people, whereas games like WWE18 was such a lazy jub that it deservedly flopped.

Since when is more profit not better than enough profit?

No, Doom 2016 dont runs at 25 FPS, it runs at 30 FPS, but can go to 25 in same cases. For record, same game on base XB1 runs most of time at 830p and frame rate from 60FPS go down to 40 FPS (Digital Foundry), so actualy we talking about quite demanding game in any case and actualy first Switch AAA port so results were not best. Doom is not horrible and unplayable, especially after patches. CoD dont seems more demanding than Doom Eternal for instance, and Doom Eternal is coming to Switch.

Doom probably sold around 500k with digital sales for now, thats a quite good number for late and full priced port, on still limted install base. There is also reason why Bethesda is also bringing Doom Eternal and this time they aiming to be released in same time with other versions. If its true what you saying, that those games are unplayable and horrible on Switch, that they sold terrible and that they dont attract any part of Switch consumer base, Bethesda wouldn't bringed Doom Eternal also.

Also fact, CoD game were avilible on Wii (PS3/360 ports) and on Wii U also, it not crazy to expect that CoD will come to Switch also eventually especially when difference between Switch and XB1/PS4 is smaller in any case than going from Wii to PS3/360.

The Switch's install-base growth is more comparable to the Wii than the Wii U.  Curl-6's comparison is much better.  By your logic, Fifa 18 on Switch should not be crossing the million threshold, because Fifa 13 didn't sell half that on Wii U in its lifetime.

Fifa 13 (Wii U):  .49m (lifetime)
Fifa 18 (Switch):  .99m (less than 1 year)

In my opinion, this developer look and sounds out of touch. The days of laughing at Nintendo's hardware or the prospect of your game attempting to reach Nintendo's audience is long gone. It seems, this man did not get the memo.