By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Shining Resonance Refrain gets 73 on Opencritic. Similar scores on metacritic.

I was excited until i played the demo and was dissapointed... gameplay was boring and the opposite of compelling, and there was something about the story and lore that didnt click with me (even though i wanted to like it), it felt generic (and i dont like to use that word at all but i dont know how else to describe it).

I guess the best way i can describe this game is:

"what if one of those (many) generic animes we get every season was made into a game and it had boring gameplay".



I am not surprised. Nothing about Resonance screamed must buy. The Demo, the streams ... all looked totally average.



 

outlawauron said:
Cerebralbore101 said:

Shining Resonance Refrain has gotten 72 on Opencritic. Metacritic has a different score per platform, but every score is around the same range. 

http://opencritic.com/game/6319/shining-resonance-refrain

I was semi-interested in this one, until I realized that it was being made by the same people that did Valkyria Revolution. 

From what I've read, combat is clunky, the story and settings are very generic, and the game is extremely grindy. 

I've read a lot of differing opinions as well. And you're talking about Media.vision as the developers, so please put a little respect on that name despite Valkyria Revolution.

I've heard good things about the PS1 Wild Arms games. 



Chazore said:
JRPGfan said:

Reviewers hate jrpgs apparently..... I dont always trust these reviewers, because of how much taste levels effect things.
All I can say is I saw the trailers, and those looked intresting. I wanna try it out, dispite whatever reviewers score it.

That's good, because if they all shared your exact tastes, then we'd get shitty review scores for stuff you dislike all the time. It's good to have different reviews and reviewers who like different games. 

Fifa & Call of Duty would be in the 50's on metacritic :p
Zelda BoTW would be really high, same with Persona 5 & Horizon Zero Dawn...... oh wait, they already are :)



JRPGfan said:

Fifa & Call of Duty would be in the 50's on metacritic :p
Zelda BoTW would be really high, same with Persona 5 & Horizon Zero Dawn...... oh wait, they already are :)

>using meta crit as the only source, a subjective one.

Still a good thing not every review is the same, and that we have good games that you may not like. Using meta to say "they are bad" just adds to poor form tbh. 



Step right up come on in, feel the buzz in your veins, I'm like an chemical electrical right into your brain and I'm the one who killed the Radio, soon you'll all see

So pay up motherfuckers you belong to "V"

Chazore said:
JRPGfan said:

Fifa & Call of Duty would be in the 50's on metacritic :p
Zelda BoTW would be really high, same with Persona 5 & Horizon Zero Dawn...... oh wait, they already are :)

>using meta crit as the only source, a subjective one.

Still a good thing not every review is the same, and that we have good games that you may not like. Using meta to say "they are bad" just adds to poor form tbh. 

I was jokeing dude.... jeez.

You should know that Call of Duty & Fifa arnt in the 50's range on metacritic.
However Zelda, Persona 5, and HZD are all high (as Id rate them too).

I mostly agree with reviewers on alot of games.



It's pretty good. I never expected to enjoy it as much. The characters are likeable, the world is beautiful, and the music is absolutely amazing.

I've only ever played a handful of high fantasy games over the years - the last being Final Fantasy XII on the PS2 - but if this is considered "generic" then I've really been missing out.



Looks fine to me, 7/10 is about what I'd expect.



Veknoid_Outcast said:
I’ll be writing up a review for the site ASAP so stay tuned for that!

Oh yeah, I think I added VGchartz to my contributor list on Opencritic. ETA on the review? Is anybody reviewing Octopath Traveler for this site? 



JRPGfan said:
Chazore said:

>using meta crit as the only source, a subjective one.

Still a good thing not every review is the same, and that we have good games that you may not like. Using meta to say "they are bad" just adds to poor form tbh. 

I was jokeing dude.... jeez.

You should know that Call of Duty & Fifa arnt in the 50's range on metacritic.
However Zelda, Persona 5, and HZD are all high (as Id rate them too).

I mostly agree with reviewers on alot of games.

A little /s at the end can save lives



Step right up come on in, feel the buzz in your veins, I'm like an chemical electrical right into your brain and I'm the one who killed the Radio, soon you'll all see

So pay up motherfuckers you belong to "V"