By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - NSFW Discussion - Sizes of the World lol

CrazyGamer2017 on 14 January 2018
curl-6 said:
I don't even know my size. Since all I use it for is urination and masturbation, size is somewhat irrelevant.

Most relevant and sensible post in this entire thread.

Also since the erogenous zones inside the vagina are 2 to 3 inches deep maximum (I bet many did not know this), anyone at least 3 inches of size can satisfy women the same as someone with a dick as big as a stadium. And most people are within 5 to 6 inches of size so a bit smaller or a bit bigger than that is irrelevant (except maybe to your immature egos).



VGPolyglot on 14 January 2018
celador said:
VGPolyglot said:

If you treat women of a singular entity, of course that's going to happen. You could say the exact same for men in that case.

i find the hypocrisy to be much, much more common amongst women. More than happy to judge men for whatever, but as soon as men dare to have standards back it's all 'sexism' 'misogyny' 'body shaming' 'unrealistic body standards' 'patriarchy' blah blah blah

You find it to be much, much more common? Do you have any proof to back it up?



celador on 14 January 2018
VGPolyglot said:
celador said:

i find the hypocrisy to be much, much more common amongst women. More than happy to judge men for whatever, but as soon as men dare to have standards back it's all 'sexism' 'misogyny' 'body shaming' 'unrealistic body standards' 'patriarchy' blah blah blah

You find it to be much, much more common? Do you have any proof to back it up?

only proof of experience. but there is a reason, for example, the fat acceptance movement focuses 99% on women, because women seem to feel entitled to men's attention and attraction. And you can see the reaction on social media whenever a man says something about a woman's looks, yet no one cares about women doing the same to men. This image sums it up well

 



celador on 14 January 2018
John2290 said:
celador said:
when are we going to get a study to tell us what nationality of women have the tightest pussies?

Going to have to assume it's the Asians, right? 

yeah, my guess would be east asians



VGPolyglot on 14 January 2018
celador said:
VGPolyglot said:

You find it to be much, much more common? Do you have any proof to back it up?

only proof of experience. but there is a reason, for example, the fat acceptance movement focuses 99% on women, because women seem to feel entitled to men's attention and attraction. And you can see the reaction on social media whenever a man says something about a woman's looks, yet no one cares about women doing the same to men. This image sums it up well

 

Jennifer Lawrence equals one woman. If we're going that route, you can find numerous instances of disgustingly sexist men.



Farsala on 14 January 2018
CrazyGamer2017 said:
curl-6 said:
I don't even know my size. Since all I use it for is urination and masturbation, size is somewhat irrelevant.

Most relevant and sensible post in this entire thread.

Also since the erogenous zones inside the vagina are 2 to 3 inches deep maximum (I bet many did not know this), anyone at least 3 inches of size can satisfy women the same as someone with a dick as big as a stadium. And most people are within 5 to 6 inches of size so a bit smaller or a bit bigger than that is irrelevant (except maybe to your immature egos).

2-3 is all that's needed, but there is a reason that men evolved to have larger penis than other primates. A good example is just using 2-3 for starting out and than when everything is warmed up the vagina can expand to 6 inch and big dick users can hit secondary g spots like the anterior fornix easier.



celador on 14 January 2018
VGPolyglot said:

Jennifer Lawrence equals one woman. If we're going that route, you can find numerous instances of disgustingly sexist men.

it's just an example of what i was saying. As i said, imo, there are more disgustingly sexist women on this topic than there are men. But of course, because it reflects badly on women, no one can talk about it.



Alara317 on 14 January 2018
celador said:
Alara317 said:

We won't, because vaginas have variable tightness and malleability, while Cocks are pretty rigid in their size (Pun intended).

Plus, cocks are easier to measure. vaginas would be VERY hard to properly make a silicone mould out of. 

doesn't matter if it's difficult, we should demand it

for equality

Equality is about having equal rights and social status, not about doing the exact same thing to everyone. Some people ARE different, that's just a fact. Women have vaginas, and men have penises (at least in the biological sense, not getting into a gender identity argument here). Therefore, the amenities and gender-based accommodations will be difference. 

That's not inequality, that's a case of acknowledging differences. 



celador on 14 January 2018
Alara317 said:
celador said:

doesn't matter if it's difficult, we should demand it

for equality

Equality is about having equal rights and social status, not about doing the exact same thing to everyone. Some people ARE different, that's just a fact. Women have vaginas, and men have penises (at least in the biological sense, not getting into a gender identity argument here). Therefore, the amenities and gender-based accommodations will be difference. 

That's not inequality, that's a case of acknowledging differences. 

i agree, but i see that idea rejected when it suits women, so i will reject it when it suits me too



VGPolyglot on 14 January 2018
celador said:
VGPolyglot said:

Jennifer Lawrence equals one woman. If we're going that route, you can find numerous instances of disgustingly sexist men.

it's just an example of what i was saying. As i said, imo, there are more disgustingly sexist women on this topic than there are men. But of course, because it reflects badly on women, no one can talk about it.

No one can talk about it, yet we're talking about it right now...