View Post

[DonFerrari]

S.Peelman said:

DonFerrari said:

I don't see myself or many others enjoying playing this type of game on 15min slots to take use of all the "but I would play it everywhere anytime while on TV I wouldn't play it at all". Even more for people that live in places you either don't sit to commute, you have to keep atention to your whereabouts to not lose the station and are at risk of robbery.

Maybe, maybe not. Doesn’t matter to me though. I actually play my Switch, or any handheld, at home. On occasion I bring one with me on holiday, but never to commute.

I usually play Switch handheld, rarely tabletop, occasionally on tv, for ‘normal’ lengths of play. One hour, two, maybe three if I’m really into it. Though once I played Twilight Princess HD on WiiU’s Gamepad, so off-tv, for 11 hours straight lol. It’s a combination of it being an easier and more casual way to just pick up a handheld and start playing, tv’s being occupied, people being in the room period (and as such not wanting to start such a big distraction in the middle of the room) and me not wanting to sit alone in a room away from other people in the house.

So if it involves a multiplat this factoid is a huge part of my decision making, and more often than not I’d rather play something with mediocre performance and graphics all the way through, than barely playing something at all and having wasted my money. The graphics and performance have no inpact whatsoever on the chance of me actually playing a game I own.

Like I said though, this doesn’t necessarily relate to Witcher 3, it’s my general way of thinking, just saying that there’s a market for people buying “lesser” versions, for whatever reason.

Obviously though, if a port is a terrible broken mess, the logic goes down the drain. I still have some standard.

Understood. In my house usually I have free domain of the TV and play as much as I want =]