JRPGfan said:
Your explaination is better than the one Phil or whoever this quote is from, is. Still.... all this coulda been avoided I feel like, its unnessary to even say this much. Theres probably ways around running into such issues. My question is..... if Ludicrous is able to give a short, sweet, precise answear, that leaves no room for confusion. Why the hell cant the guys at Xbox do the same? "The past year has been an exciting time for us as we have more than doubled the internal creative teams making up Xbox Game Studios. As these new studios transitioned in, we were aware of some existing commitments to other platforms and will honor them. However, going forward these new studios will focus on making games for our platforms. We have no plans to further expand our exclusive first party games to other consoles. We continue to believe deeply in cross play and progression of games with the right flexibility for developers to insure a fair and fun experience." Why is it that long?
|
Probably because Ludicrous is doing his interpretation and simplification and that isn't the true message MS is giving.
Better yet, let's accuse everyone of spinning since MS doesn't spin things.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."