By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Miyamotoo said:
DonFerrari said:

Not asking why they have less support. But seems like you admitted that technical point is quite relevant for a game like this not getting released.

Which contradicts your point that it having small performance gap and similar tools allowing these type of games to shown on Switch.

You asked "So what is the major reason for games like RDR2 and other big scope AAA games not to launch on Switch", I mentioned all the reasons effects that some games dont come to Switch.

You doing it again, pls stop doing that if you want to make further normal discussion, dont twist things or claims things that no one said. I didnt said that smaller power power gap and support for modern engines and tools means that every game will come to Switch. But offcourse that with small power gap and support for modern tools, APIs, engines.. means Switch has/will have better support than it would if power gap was much bigger and that Switch dont supports modern tools, APIs, engines..(like in case of Wii). And like I wrote, its not only point about those things, but also like I wrote Nintendo platforms  generaly have weaker 3rd party support than PS/XB platforms from SNES, Switch coming after biggest Nintendo fail, big difference with time of release compared to PS4/XB1.

So can now I have an agreement that Reggie was BSing when pointing to the time in development as reason for RDR2 not showing on Switch? Because before you said he was right.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."