NobleTeam360 said:
But it's true. |
I do agree. At least that is what their games have been getting. But we will also have people saying that we shouldn't let the score say the game is bad, that a lot of their friends are loving it, and that GAAS is the best leap forward in gaming.
On the 90 score, read the review and it doesn't say anything that really should put the game on 9 except that he loves Crackdown and since this is better then it gets better review, wouldn't say it's professional or unbiased, but at least it seems sincere.
And the screens I seem look poor on the eye candy.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
